Don’t let the bastards grind you down!
We Get What We Allow
Interesting little conversation kind of goes back to what’s going on in the city of talent right…
We get what we allow to happen in the running of management of our cities, that’s reality.
We got what we’re dealing with now, we got what we did when we allow Jeff Golden to be elected into legislative capacity, same with Pam Marsh.
The city of Talent, I don’t know why but they keep referring to the strength of our democracy, we don’t have a democracy.
We have a republic and it’s that difference that allows us to control what really goes on when they falsify the consensus aspect. The current city manager I don’t know but…
I know Nancy said good things about the current city manager last hour…
What I’m saying is that committing as a city that just wants to create the urban renewal situation that they were on track for, I question the background of the management and this is what it comes down so we have to understand this they have to understand she was appointed according to the city charter they appoint these people remember who the prior city manager was, it was Jamie McLeod Skinner.
Who by the way was an utter failure…
That’s right and we have to look at the questioning where we live, you have to be involved in these selections you have to voice your opinion. The Hatfield school is a background okay great…
Okay so you’re talking about the background of the current city of Talent manager, right?
Okay so tell me what you found there on the LinkedIn page..
You’ll see that she was a board member I think of Rogue Climate, and then it goes back…
Now that’s really interesting because Rogue Climate has been one of the agenda-based groups that it was punching above its weight in this urban renewal conversation that Nancy was talking about in exposing.
We are allowing this by nature of not participating enough or looking at it realistically enough.
Now she was also part of the Hatfield school, now the Hatfield School is about as prog as they get isn’t it?
That’s the Hatfield School of governance and government. This is where they’re teaching these consensus based processes that if you can if you can buffoon the public into not participating and make them believe that there’s a consensus that everybody’s happy with this move, this is what we do. Let’s do the policy consensus model the predetermined outcome…
The predetermined outcome that we shove everything into urban renewal in this particular case because of blight, right now we’re gonna take this pile of money and we’re gonna be able to accomplish our progressive goals within the city of Talent.
I look at this is not even a progressive goal I look at this is the goal of the destruction…
I look at it as a being run like a racket that pretends to be a city…
That’s exactly right. I look at this way, we know at least they owe the public a chance in an understanding of who they are. An accurate description of their background education and belief system. The moment these people get up there and say, “we’re here to further our democracy” well, you know then they’re defining that they don’t have the right to be there because we don’t have a democracy. and that’s the essence of it. I know I didn’t wake up with the idea of calling in here today but only when I listen to the stuff that deep the information is there all around us and we are looking to these people for direction you look up home they mentioned the trauma on the city of Talent, of the people who real trouble is the people who had the money the real trauma is the people that lost all their homes that don’t have a place to come.
Real trauma as not bringing up the fact that that you got city politicians running rackets are trying to push agenda based rackets you know that’s not traumatic that’s reality base thinking…
It’s an absurdity. Forced change due to climate, this is absolutely an absurdity, the climate is consistently changing. It has throughout my whole life and I look at the stuff and it’s like OK so we deal with it we have to deal with it but driving people out of their homes of where they chosen to live that’s not an option. Sorry you don’t have that right because we live in a Republic not a democracy.
Thank you very much Ed and on that note we’ll talk more about that another day I don’t have time with the moment but that was a great way to wrap it, I know you weren’t planning on going out but I wanted to hear what you had to say about that thanks for exposing that bit about the LinkedIn profile okay it’s good to know okay have a good one.
Quick chat with Mr X
Talking about SB 762
We Must Pay Attention
Understand Your Fundamental Right
Stand for your Medical Freedom, Here’s How
Make a meaningful comment and End this Medical Tyrrany
Part 2 with Bill and Mr X 8-13-21
Here are numerous links to take you “down the path” of the tyranny we’re currently experiencing.
To Here https://www.oregon.gov/pharmacy/Pages/Board-Members.aspx
“**There are currently multiple opportunities available for interested persons to serve on the Board as well as the Public Health & Pharmacy Formulary Advisory Committee. Visit our “Opportunities” page for more information! ”
To Here https://www.oregon.gov/pharmacy/Pages/Board-Minutes.aspx
To Here https://www.oregon.gov/pharmacy/Documents/February_2021_Bd_Mtg_Agenda.pdf
on page 62 of 100 or page 11 of legislative report
“Temporarily prohibited dispensing of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 to preserve supplies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and lupus”
took me here
actual supply issues addressed https://www.outsourcing-pharma.com/Article/2020/03/23/Industry-ups-chloroquine-production
Ivermectin Prescriptions for Treating or Preventing COVID-19
“The US Food and Drug Administration has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID- 19 in humans and it has not been proven to be safe or effective for this indication. Pharmacists receiving prescriptions for ivermectin for the treatment or prevention COVID-19 should use their professional judgment in determining whether to fill them. If you have concerns related to the prescribing practices of a practitioner, it may be appropriate to reach out to their licensing board.
The following rules may apply: OAR 855-019-0200 General Responsibilities of a Pharmacist
The Oregon Board of Pharmacy serves to promote and protect public health, safety and welfare by ensuring high standards in the practice of pharmacy and through effective regulation of the manufacture and distribution of drugs.ORS 689.025 states that “the practice of pharmacy in the State of Oregon is declared a health care professional practice affecting the public health, safety and welfare”. Pharmacy practice is a dynamic patient-oriented health service that applies a scientific body of knowledge to improve and promote patient health by means of appropriate drug use, drug-related therapy, and communication for clinical and consultative purposes.
A pharmacist licensed to practice pharmacy by the Board has the duty to use that degree of care, skill, diligence and professional judgment that is exercised by an ordinarily careful pharmacist in the same or similar circumstances. OAR 855-019-0210 Duties of the Pharmacist Receiving a Prescription (2) A pharmacist receiving a prescription is responsible for: (a) Using professional judgment in dispensing only pursuant to a valid prescription. A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription if the pharmacist, in their professional judgment, believes that the prescription was issued without a valid patient-practitioner relationship. In this rule, the term practitioner shall include a clinical associate of the practitioner or any other practitioner acting in the practitioner’s absence. The prescription must be issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of their professional practice and not result solely from a questionnaire or an internet-based relationship; On 4/2/2020, the Oregon Board of Pharmacy revised the adopted an emergency temporary rule (OAR 855-007-0085) which limits the dispensing of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine (CQ/HCQ) as a measure to preserve supplies for treatment of malaria, inflammatory conditions, and patients with COVID-19 infection. In response to the challenges related to testing availability and delayed resulting times faced by Oregon care providers, the revised language permits dispensing of CQ/HCQ to hospitalized/institutionalized individuals with either a positive test result for COVID-19 or pursuant to a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 infection.
- Prescription Therapy for COVID-19 Patients Informational/FAQs – updated 4/2/2020
As this situation evolves, the Board continues to reassess temporary rule OAR 855-007-0085, to continue monitoring emerging evidence, availability of testing, and by working with state leadership, the Oregon Health Authority and the Oregon Medical Board to modify or rescind the rule as appropriate .”
Additional reading here:
go down to page 15 Oregon follow link to Sec of State OAR page ” rule not found “
From BIll Meyer’s blog kmed.com
Call To Action – Email the Board with your meaningful public comments, and let’s end this medical tyranny, stand for medical freedom, and allow Ivermectin and HCQ to be prescribed by our doctors OUTSIDE OF HOSPITALS and actually FILLED by our local pharmacists. Right now the rules are setup to REQUIRE Oregon Pharmacists to REPORT Doctors who prescribe HCQ and Ivermectin and they can actually LOSE THEIR LICENSE. Under the current administrative rule (NOT a LAW) HCQ can be given to someone in Oregon ONLY inside the hospital, and by then it’s often too late to be effective. Email address is firstname.lastname@example.org
Oh, an interesting bit of reading on a Ivermectin Study from the American Journal of Therapeutics:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
Understand and Make a Public Comment
Understand and Make a public comment
Oregon OSHA’s Proposal on Rules Addressing the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency in All Oregon Workplaces January 2021 Text removed is in [brackets with line through]. Text added is in bold and underline. 437-001-0744 Addressing COVID-19 Workplace Risks Unless otherwise indicated, the rule’s provisions take effect [November 16, 2020.The rule will]May 4, 2021, and remain in effect until [May 4, 2021, unless]revised or repealed [before that date]. Note: Although the rule must be adopted as a permanent rule, its purpose is to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Oregon OSHA intends to repeal the rule when it is no longer necessary to address that pandemic. Because it is not possible to assign a specific time for that decision, Oregon OSHA will consult with the Oregon OSHA Partnership Committee, the Oregon Health Authority, and other stakeholders as circumstances change to determine when all or part of the rule can be appropriately repealed. (1) Scope and Application (a) This rule applies to all employees working in places of employment subject to Oregon OSHA’s jurisdiction.
For clarity and ease of reference, this rule refers to “COVID-19” when describing exposures or potential exposures to SARSCoV-2, the virus that causes Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Public health law examines the authority of the government at various jurisdictional levels to improve the health of the general population within societal limits and norms. Local and state health agencies are the first line of preparedness for infectious disease pandemics and other threats to the health of the public. Their success hinges on many factors, including, their “legal preparedness,” that is, their understanding of and capacity to use, laws and legal authorities that support effective response. Those legal authorities are complex and involve laws at the federal, state, local, and Tribal levels. Further, they are found in multiple sectors, including not only the public health sector but also such sectors as emergency management, health care, law enforcement, education, and transportation.
Here is Bill’s Summary of the discussion with Ed, with specific points to consider when creating your public comment.
OSHA wants to make COVID rules PERMANENT – send your meaningful public comment in by close of business Friday.
email@example.com is the comment email address.
Here is the pdf of the OSHA rules proposal for reference. OSHA permanent rule Info
Points you could make in your comments – try to make as much of it in your own words, of course:
- Describe in your own words the detrimental effects the current rules have had on you, your business, and the economy, and how making this permanent would affect you.
- OSHA refers to “Covid-19”, which is a collection of symptoms which cover at least 5 other coronavirus illnesses. SARS CoV-2 is the infectious agent of concern, which has not been isolated. OSHA may desire to call it Covid-19 for clarity and ease of implementations, but OSHA’s rules don’t permit this, and again it violates constitutional provisions.
- ORS 183.400 4a indicates if a rule violates constitutional provisions that it’s null and void.
- OSHA has engaged “stakeholders” with regard to their “Covid-19” rule making. The term “stakeholder” indicates that it used a Consensus Process, and according to ORS 183.400, was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures. The agency can normally use a consensus process only if there isn’t other existing law and procedure available. In other words, OSHA has used a fraudulent consensus process to arrive at these rules.
We Must Engage and Participate
We must increase the ability to respond and stop the unneccesary loss of property and life.
Rasism and climate change had nothing to do with the damage and destruction we faced.
If we don’t react and comment and give the stories that matter we have no way to change the direction of the input of this
The inclusion of everyone is what is mandatory.
What they want is not necessarily what they get. If we engage and participate. Tell the stories that matter. Ask the questions that you want answered.
Where was the emergency management?
Why wasn’t the emergency broadcast system used to warn?
Intrusion, interference with our freedom and ability to produce and provide for our families.
Recognize what it is, respond with the alternative.
Should Smoke Rule Exemption be approved?
Should Smoke Rule Exemption be approved?
We Must Rise
We Must Rise
Notes from Mr X and Bill Meyer’s conversation on thursday’s show.
the Governor’s Fire Service Policy Council continue to be well pleased with the great work done by Chief Walker and his team
Curious timing for his departure
Oregon fire marshal Jim Walker abruptly resigns after being put on leave amid historic wildfires
Sustainable development discussion
CURRENT OREGON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES
SCIENCE FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
State of Fire: Fire in Oregon’s Forests
Oregon Consensus Current Projects/
Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fireprone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality
OREGON FOREST FIRE AND RESILIENCE INVESTMENT PACKAGE
Representative Pam Marsh, firstname.lastname@example.org, 503-986-1405
2021 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – FOREST SERVICE
Research and Development Wildland Fire and Fuels Accomplishments and Outcomes
A Wildfire Risk Assessment Framework for Land and Resource Management
Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world
Notes from previous conversations…
This is still the main policy guideline pay attention to executive summary and vision…
Page 1 (actual page 9) Qoute…